D.C. Language Access Bill A Terrible IdeaProposed legislation would cost over $7 millionApril 15, 2003
WASHINGTON D.C. – U.S. ENGLISH strongly opposes a proposed bill that would require translators in all Washington D.C. city agencies and create a citywide coordinator to ensure that residents who are not proficient in English are provided access to services. City officials estimate the program would cost $7.74 million to implement through 2006.Advocates of the D.C. Language Access Bill cite particular horror stories to make their case for a multilingual city government:
“These are all unfortunate incidents but the way to prevent things like this from happening again is to have immigrants learn English as quickly as possible,” said Mauro Mujica, Chairman and CEO of U.S. ENGLISH. “Instead of catering to each and every language group, Washington D.C. should follow the lead of 27 states and declare English the official language of city government. The money they save from implementing this common sense policy could then be used to provide more English classes for immigrants, rather than providing translators.” At a time of belt tightening, this legislation is an expense that the D.C. government cannot afford. “Multilingualism in government is not cheap, as other states and localities have discovered. There are hundreds of languages spoken in the D.C. area. Is the city going to provide translators for each language at every city agency?” asked Mujica. “In addition, this legislation would send the wrong message to immigrants. In effect, it is saying ‘You can live in our city for six years and not bother to learn our language because we will cater to you.’” With so much diversity the nation’s capital needs to ensure some unity. U.S. ENGLISH urges the D.C. government to reject the Language Access Bill and to consider official English legislation to unite all district residents around a common tongue. |
Get Involved |
Stay InformedPlease enter your email address below to receive U.S. English communications |
